Category Archives: Education

2024 STFM Conference Feedback Insights: A Message From Your 2025 STFM Conference on Practice & Quality Improvement Steering Committee

We wish to thank everyone who provided feedback on our 2024 STFM Conference on Practice & Quality Improvement. We carefully review all feedback to make adjustments and changes for future conferences. In the spirit of transparency, we would like to share some additional information with you about conference planning and respond to some of the reoccurring comments from you.

Why aren’t there more meals/snacks/refreshments available throughout the meeting day?

We do make every effort to provide meals/snacks/refreshments for conference attendees to enjoy and would love to be able to offer these items in unlimited amounts all day long. However, it is not financially possible without significantly raising the conference registration. Banquet pricing is much higher than what you would pay for the same items for household use. To give you some perspective, here is the pricing of a few items for a conference:

  • Gallon of Coffee/Tea: $150
  • Soda: $8 each
  • Continental Breakfast: $60
  • Granola bar: $7 each
  • Boxed lunch: $67

We also list all provided meals (including a list of the menu items) and refreshment breaks in the daily conference schedule so attendees know what to expect and can plan accordingly.

Where does my conference registration fee go?

The majority of revenue received from conference registration fees are used to pay the expenses of running a conference food and beverage, audio/video, conference app, and plenary speaker fees. STFM also relies on net revenue from conferences to support other missions of the organization. STFM has a $6 million operating budget, and revenue from membership brings in about $1.5 million. That means STFM needs to make up the difference in other non-dues revenue generating activities like conferences, journal advertising, subscription-based services to pay for other important expenses and initiatives like staff salaries, rent, IT infrastructure, advocacy efforts, our journals, and other key programs that don’t have a charge.

How does STFM choose conference locations?

Conference locations are booked many years in advance. Our venue options are limited due to conference size and the large amount of meeting space we require. Our STFM staff work hard to remain educated about properties around the country that bring the best value for the cost, and we negotiate the best contracts possible with hotels, including room rates, reduced food and beverage prices, complimentary meeting room space, and more. Our attendees travel from across the country; for this reason, STFM rotates location of the conference between central, east coast, and west coast

The conference app was difficult to use and had many technical issues.

In 2025, STFM will be introducing a new conference mobile app. The new app will offer new features that will improve user experience. The app will also offer attendees many ways to connect/network with each other within the app.   

Thank you again for attending the STFM Conference on Practice & Quality Improvement, continuing to complete your conference evaluations, and providing this valuable feedback. If you have any questions and comments, please reach out to STFM’s Director of Conferences Melissa Abuel, CMP, at mabuel@stfm.org

Insights into Whole Person Care: A Reflection on My Visit to St. Joseph Hospital with Melissa Arthur, PhD, LCSW, LMFT


By Sydney Brown, Coordinator of Conferences and Special Projects at STFM

Sydney Brown’s work supports STFM fellowship programs, conference planning, special meetings, and more.

In July 2024, I had the invaluable opportunity to visit St. Joseph Hospital in Syracuse, NY, under the guidance of Melissa Arthur, PhD, LCSW, LMFT, Director of Behavioral Science at St. Joseph Hospital in Syracuse Former STFM BFEF Mentorship Director. My background, initially outside the realms of hospitals, medicine, or fellowships, made this experience particularly enlightening. I am deeply grateful to Dr Arthur for her encouragement and facilitation of this insightful visit.

Immersing in Patient Care

My visit began with attending a lecture for medical students, a profound introduction to the complexities of medical education. The session showcased not only the depth of academic instruction but also how behaviorists like Dr Arthur contribute to shaping the educational framework. Observing this integration of theoretical knowledge with practical application highlighted the comprehensive nature of medical training at St. Joseph Hospital.

A key highlight was sitting in on a “Bio Psycho Social” visit, where Dr Arthur was actively involved. This extended patient-doctor interaction illustrated the significance of addressing psychological and social factors in addition to physical health. Witnessing this whole person approach emphasized how understanding a patient’s emotional and social context can enhance overall care and efficacy in medical practice.

Understanding Institutional Support and Well-Being

Equally enlightening was my exposure to the hospital’s institutional support systems. Attending a committee meeting on the “Care of the Colleague” revealed St. Joseph Hospital’s commitment to creating a supportive work environment. This committee’s focus on the well-being of healthcare professionals underscores the importance of fostering a positive and effective healthcare environment, where the mental and emotional health of staff is prioritized.

Additionally, learning about Schwartz Rounds, known locally as Rena Rounds, provided insight into the hospital’s dedication to emotional support. These rounds address the psychological and emotional challenges faced by healthcare professionals, promoting resilience and empathy. The presence of Dr Arthur’s support dog, whom I had the pleasure of accompanying on rounds, further highlighted the impact of such initiatives. The comfort and joy the support dog brought to patients and staff underscored the importance of integrating emotional support into the healthcare environment.

Engaging with the Medical Community

My interactions with medical students and residents provided a broader perspective on their experiences. Discussing their rotations, challenges, and interests offered a personal view of their journey through medical training. This engagement also allowed me to promote the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine (STFM), emphasizing the value of community and support within the field.

A Reflection on Whole Person and Compassionate Care

The visit to St. Joseph Hospital was a transformative experience, offering a deep appreciation for the role of behaviorists like Dr Arthur in Family Medicine. Her work exemplifies the integration of whole-person patient care, institutional support, and emotional well-being, reflecting the core values of Family Medicine.

The insights gained from observing Dr Arthur and the team at St. Joseph Hospital reaffirmed the importance of a multi-dimensional approach in healthcare. I am profoundly grateful for the opportunity to witness their exemplary work and am inspired by the dedication and compassion demonstrated by all involved. Dr Arthur’s contributions to Family Medicine are both commendable and essential, and I am honored to have observed the impactful work she and her colleagues are doing.

Responding to Reviewer Suggestions…

By Sarina Schrager, MD, MS, Family Medicine editor-in-chief

It is exceedingly uncommon for a paper to get accepted when first submitted to a journal. The vast majority of papers are sent back to authors for revision. As editors, we depend on peer reviewers to provide feedback designed to make each paper better. We ask that you view the feedback that you receive from reviewers as a constructive way to improve your paper. As an author, you are asked to respond to every comment made by every reviewer, which can feel like a herculean task. The following suggestions from the editorial team are geared to help you organize and structure your responses whereby improving your chances of having your paper accepted the second time around.

  1. Don’t take it personally—remember that the reviewers are giving feedback on your paper, not on who you are as a person. Remember, by requesting a revision of your paper, the editors and the reviewers think it has potential. Creating space between yourself and the revision requests will help you move forward toward successful publication. Some people will put the revisions aside for a day or two before rereading them.
  2. Always, always respond respectfully to reviewer comments—there is nothing an editor dislikes more than an author being obstinate and dismissive about reviewer comments. The editors rely on peer reviewers volunteering their time. As such, we want to protect peer reviewers from abusive language coming from authors. It is actually common practice to thank the reviewers for their feedback (however unwelcome it may be). This is an important publishing convention because while you don’t know who the reviewers are, they see author names and they likely review for several publications.
  3. It’s okay to disagree—it is okay to disagree respectfully with a reviewer comment.  However, we recommend that you prioritize the comments you disagree with and only include a few (2-3 at maximum) in your responses. Include a detailed explanation of why you disagree and include references if available. The editors will weigh your comments and decide if they still want you to make changes.
  4. Make it easy for the editors—editors and reviewers are busy people who are often volunteering their time to help you improve your paper. So, it is up to you to do everything you can to make that task easier. We recommend that you structure your response letter in table form or use different fonts or underlines so that it is easy for the editor to see that you addressed every single comment. Also, it is good practice to specifically state how you addressed the comment. Instead of just saying “this was changed”, provide details about how you changed the paper or even cut and paste the new sentence into your table of reviewer responses.
  5. What if reviewers give me conflicting feedback?—it is challenging when reviewers have differing opinions about your paper. Most of the time, the associate editor will provide guidance about which reviewer’s comments to follow. If you don’t think that you are getting clear guidance, feel free to e-mail the editorial team for help.  It is perfectly appropriate to ask the associate editor what they think you should do.

Even if your revision does not get accepted, by following reviewer suggestions you have improved the quality of your work and are optimally positioned to submit the paper to a different journal. Happy writing and please consider signing up to be a reviewer to help make Family Medicine the best journal it can be.