Category Archives: Medical School

Improving the Clerkship Learning Environment for Introverts

“There are strengths and weaknesses associated with introverted traits and with extroverted traits. Extroverts thrive in social situations, can rapidly form relationships with team members, and are comfortable with spontaneous brainstorming, thinking aloud and offering ideas quickly and assertively. Introverts’ strengths include thoughtfulness, listening, humility, and forming deep connections. They process internally, share fully formulated thoughts, and prefer to avoid bringing attention to themselves.”

—Kendall Jones, University of Washington School of Medicine

by Kendall Jones, University of Washington School of Medicine

When I meet a patient in clinic, I am in my comfort zone, focused on connecting and creatively problem-solving. But when I leave the exam room, I feel overwhelmed and misunderstood—my mind races as I struggle to communicate my thinking. Patient care settings can be chaotic and the requirement to perform on-the-spot for evaluators frequently does not create a learning environment that accommodates introverts.

While improving the learning environment for students from all backgrounds is an ongoing effort in medical education, I haven’t heard discussion about the experience of introverted students in clinical rotations. The current model of clinical phase medical education frequently does not create a safe learning environment for introverted students. For me, this has contributed to a negative cycle of anxiety and underperforming. Patients appreciate my careful listening and thoughtful responses. But in a rushed clinic, I feel any information I can share is treated as redundant. As I present, I feel concerned about taking up too much space despite the importance of this presentation for my grade. Preceptors observe my hesitancy and lack of self-assuredness and interpret it as failure. But confidently voicing my thinking process is much more difficult “on stage” than in a real-life patient-care setting. Awful feelings related to these experiences day-in and day-out are a significant challenge: I observe myself reaching burnout faster than other classmates, and I worry that I don’t have the energy-levels, constitution, and extroversion required to succeed in medical school and residency. However, I found that research and commentaries validate my feelings and experiences. I am not alone.

Over the course of the last three decades, the Center for Research in Medical Education and Health Care has investigated medical student personality and personal characteristics and correlations with student success and patient care. In 2004, they found that greater self-esteem and higher scores of extroversion could predict global ratings of clinical competence in core clerkships in medical school. Systematic reviews support the finding that introverted students tend towards poorer evaluations related to interpersonal behavior during clerkship rotations. 1 In 2005, Davis and Banken identified significant positive correlation of extrovert traits with clinical performance in an OBGYN clerkship but no correlation with performance on the standardized subject exam, consistent with other studies finding lack of correlation between more subjective clinical evaluations and more objective measures of clinical knowledge. They thus questioned, as have others before, whether clinical evaluations should be included in the overall evaluation score or if they should be labeled ‘interpersonal skills’ rather than ‘clinical evaluation’ to more accurately describe what the evaluation reflects. 2 Surveying nearly 3,000 students who completed core clerkships, Lee et al. found that more reserved students were more likely to report lower grades while more assertive students received lower grades less frequently. 3 A possible mediator for these findings is extroversion. This allows students to demonstrate their enthusiasm and knowledge to their evaluators which can improve their subjective grade. Another explanation is that the stress of constantly trying to impress evaluators has a greater effect on introverted students while extraverted students are more at ease; introverted students are known to feel less comfortable expressing themselves in high-pressure environments and are inclined to hold back and speak only if they are 100% sure of themselves. 4, 5 While inferior evaluations can affect students’ chances at residency, the challenge of having an introverted tendency in medical training can negatively affect students’ health as well.

Multiple studies have shown an association of introversion with burnout. 6, 7 Qualitative research agrees with these findings with introverted students reporting feeling like ‘misfits’ and that they must change their identities to succeed in medical school. 1 Introverts report working to make others comfortable at the expense of their own comfort and energy levels. 1 When introverted students experience medical training invalidating their innate style of thinking and social engagement, they are more likely to experience chronic stress and anxiety. Leadership research finds that both introverts and extroverts lend important and distinct contributions to teams. 8 Learning environments ought to be tailored to fit students who fall anywhere within this temperament spectrum.

There are strengths and weaknesses associated with introverted traits and with extroverted traits. Extroverts thrive in social situations, can rapidly form relationships with team members, and are comfortable with spontaneous brainstorming, thinking aloud and offering ideas quickly and assertively. Introverts’ strengths include thoughtfulness, listening, humility, and forming deep connections. They process internally, share fully formulated thoughts, and prefer to avoid bringing attention to themselves. In clerkships, extraverted traits are beneficial for adapting to the constant rotation of locations and team members. Extraverted students are likely to be more comfortable with presenting information in quick succession and processing this information as they speak, whereas introverts desire to thoroughly gather information and feel a need for focused time to formulate assessments before sharing them with others. Not only are extroverted traits are preferred in clinical rotations, they are preferred in modern Western society as a whole. As noted by Davidson et. al., “This trend of devaluing or pathologizing introverted behavior has been noted in national studies and is emphasized in Susan Cain’s best-selling book on introversion (Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World that Can’t Stop Talking9) that Western society has shifted from appreciating a thoughtful approach of interaction with others to a more demonstrative social and assertive approach.” Natural introverts sense these preferences, and this can negatively affect students’ self-esteem. Introverts can try to act more extroverted, but this adds yet another obstacle in an already challenging environment.

In a review of literature, Davidson et. al. find that when a student’s personality and behavioral characteristics are harmonious with the learning environment this typically results in optimal performance, while an incongruent fit can lead to maladaptive behavior. 1 Unfortunately, this is personal for me—in the fast-paced, high-pressure, zero-continuity environment of clinical clerkships my introversion and anxiety increase. I’m evaluated as underperforming; I feel bad about myself, and I don’t recognize myself—someone who, when in a familiar environment, is passionate and conversational. But my brain is plastic and I have hope. I can remember the times when the learning environment was a good fit and I rose to the occasion and was recognized for what I truly have to offer. A bad fit was the rushed environment of a busy family medicine residency clinic where we were always behind and I didn’t want to hold anyone up. When I felt I had to choose between addressing the patient’s foremost concerns and impressing my preceptor, I struggled. But on inpatient medicine I knew what to expect— my attending gave me a defined time to plan for my admit and prepare to present; I was rewarded with the affirmation that my plan was nearly exactly what he would have done. The residents on the team gave daily helpful feedback allowing me to improve more during the next day’s rounds. I felt encouraged and supported in my growth as a student doctor. Unfortunately, I can’t say the same for other places I rotated.

I know the learning environment and I both have room for improvement, and we can meet in the middle. I will fight my learned anxiety with everything I can and will work on cultivating extraverted skills including thinking aloud, assertiveness, and sharing ideas before I’m 110% sure, even though it’s uncomfortable. But I demand better from the learning environment: in some patient-care settings, it feels as if there is little thought towards the goal of fostering the growth of student doctors. Showing support, encouragement and a little bit of empathy for students goes a long way, as does setting clear expectations and allowing time and space for the introverts to prepare and feel comfortable, whenever possible. If the student appears anxious, avoidant or introverted, try to meet them where they are rather than turning a blind eye. After all, as Lebin et. al. write, “the inclusion of both introverts and extroverts in leadership roles strengthens teams, departments, and organizations. We therefore champion embracing introversion in trainees, colleagues and, most importantly, in ourselves.” How can you better recognize introverted students for their thoughtfully, albeit more deliberately-formed ideas? How can you provide encouragement and attention to creating opportunities for these more reserved students to prepare and present their knowledge and reasoning?

References

  1. Davidson, B., Gillies, R. A., & Pelletier, A. L. Introversion and Medical Student Education: Challenges for Both Students and Educators. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 2015; 27(1), 99-104. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10401334.2014.979183
  1. Davis K. R., Banken J. A. Personality Type and Clinical Evaluations in an Obstetrics/gynecology Medical Student Clerkship. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;193(5):1807-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.082. PMID: 16260239.
  1. Lee, K. B., et al. “Making the Grade:” Noncognitive Predictors of Medical Students’ Clinical Clerkship Grades. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007; 99, pp. 1138-1150
  1. Noureddine L., Medina J. Learning to Break the Shell: Introverted Medical Students Transitioning Into Clinical Rotations. Academic Medicine. 2018; 93 (6): 822-822. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002222.
  1. de Jongh, R., de la Croix, A. 12 Tips to Hear the Voices of Introverts in Medical Education… and to Improve the Learning Climate for Everyone. MedEdPublish, 2021; 10(107), 107. https://mededpublish.org/articles/10-107
  1. Ramachandran, V., et al. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Medical Education: A Narrative Review and Analysis. Health Professions Education. 2020; 6(1), 31-46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245230111830124X
  1. Hojat, M., Erdmann, J. B., & Gonnella, J. S. Personality Assessments and Outcomes in Medical Education and the Practice of Medicine: AMEE Guide No. 79. Medical Teacher, 2013; 35(7), e1267-e1301. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/0142159X.2013.785654
  1. Lebin, L. G., Riddle, M., Chang, S. et al. Continuing the Quiet Revolution: Developing Introverted Leaders in Academic Psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2019; 43, 516–520. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40596-019-01052-8 
  1. Cain S. Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can’t Stop Talking. New York, NY: Crown/Random House, 2012.

Double Feature: A Spotlight on Global Health Education

Note from the Editor: The December blog contains two important submissions on global family medicine and the factors that contribute to inequities in the field including but not limited to funding, climate change, geopolitical events, and more. Thank you to Barry Bacon, MD, Martha Sommers, MD, Bhargavi Chkuri, MD, and Meredith Milligan, MD

Dream School: How One Patient Encounter Can Change the Direction of Your Life

One patient encounter can change the direction of your life.

Our team, Gambella Medical Team Connections in Western Ethiopia and Anchor Health for South Sudan in South Sudan, dreams of creating a medical school to change health outcomes for the region. This long-term strategy will build up the region’s workforce with physicians and other local-to-the-area healthcare workers familiar with the area’s needs.

The challenges we face include:

  • Lack of livable wages. Doctors in South Sudan are employed by the government and receive $12 per month.
  • Lack of funding and support. Donor countries who had been sponsoring healthcare support in South Sudan have retracted their financial support.
  • Lack of access to quality medical care. There are five hospitals in the Gambella region serving a million people. These hospitals have one functioning x-ray machine and one functioning operating room.
  • Lack of physicians. There are 120 physicians in South Sudan serving a population of 12 million, a ratio of 1:100,000. In 2013, there were nine midwives and eight OB/GYNs identified in all of South Sudan. As a result, one in seven women die from childbirth complications. We witnessed a child dying in his parents’ arms while waiting to be seen by a physician at the central hospital.
  • Lack of access to medicines, equipment, and tools required to provide quality care.
  • Lack of tools. Nursing schools in Gambella don’t even have a blood pressure cuff and must teach their students without one.
  • Outsourcing. Medical care is outsourced at a cost of $200 million per year to other countries.
  • Conflict. There are 400,000 refugees in the Gambella region. Facility transfers must transport patients during times of conflict.

Many members of our team fled South Sudan and Gambella due to the conflict and violence. After arriving in the United States, they received an education and they returned to the region, bringing colleagues and US recruits with them with the goal of transforming healthcare in South Sudan and the Gambella region of Ethiopia. Thanks to presentations at the 2019 and 2021 AAFP Global Health Summit, we were able to grow our team and support network. The connections built by our team, along with their local knowledge led to Marshall University’s Family Medicine Global Health Division joining the effort; and the sharing of widespread contacts that contribute to our progress.

We’ve been offered a hospital in Juba to create a multi-specialty healthcare center and a base for medical education. Our vision is to invite US-based instructors and specialty teams to provide care for patients while teaching medical students and South Sudanese physicians. Additionally, we must address the policy fiascos that prevent healthcare professionals from receiving sustainable, livable income. For over five years, we’ve worked on our dream of developing an international medical school with campuses, and teaching sites in remote hospital and clinical settings in South Sudan and Western Ethiopia. We have the support of both leaders in South Sudan, the Gamebella regional government, and are audacious enough to believe we will accomplish our dream.

Globally, the world is asking more of family medicine.  As teachers of family medicine, we are learning how to meet the needs in South Sudan and Gambella, and focusing on increasing opportunities to involve medical students, residents, and colleagues as we move forward.

Join us.

Barry Bacon, MD
250 S Main St
Colville, WA  99114
Anchor Health for South Sudan
Gambella Medical Team Connections
baconbarry@juno.com


Martha Sommers, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Family and Community Medicine
Marshall University

References

(1)https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/the-rising-importance-of-family-medicine

Margaret Chan. (June 26, 2013). The rising importance of family medicine. Paper presented at the 2013 World Congress of the World Organization of Family Doctors, Retrieved from https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/the-rising-importance-of-family-medicine

Modernizing Global Women’s Health Curricula: Inclusivity, Intersectionality, and Climate Change

by Bhargavi Chekuri, MD, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, and Meredith Milligan, MD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH

Gender inequality remains one of the most important drivers of disparities in health and well-being worldwide. To address these disparities, global women’s health research and curricula have been developed to better meet the unique health needs of women worldwide. While training programs often provide much needed focus on reproductive and obstetric care, infectious diseases, and cancer screening, significant blind spots remain.

First, gender continues to be categorized as binary in most of the research focused on global women’s health. As a result, teaching in this field fails to incorporate intersectionality, overlooking the physical and mental health needs of other sexual and gender minorities (SGMs). Additionally, teachers of global women’s health, and indeed medical educators more broadly, do not adequately integrate planetary health into their curricula. This is problematic because climate change is already worsening current global health disparities with well-documented gender-specific impacts, making it one of the most important, cross-cutting determinants of health in the 21st century. Research and teaching at the nexus of all three of these issues (global women’s health, health needs of other SGMs, and climate change) is even rarer, despite the fact that SGMs are particularly vulnerable due to compounding issues such as discrimination.

Gender-specific Impacts of Climate Change

Climate change harms human health by altering the quality and quantity of our air, water, food and weather. Increased temperatures and drought, poor air quality, more intense extreme weather events, and changing disease patterns all affect mortality and morbidity, resulting in injury, poor cardiovascular and respiratory outcomes, and worsening mental health worldwide. Globally, women and other SGMs face increased exposure to the consequences of climate change due to existing health disparities as well as differences in gender roles and responsibilities. When faced with these exposures, unequal resource distribution further limits the adaptive capacity and resilience of women and other SGMs. Women in low-income countries (LIC), for example, have disproportionate exposure to food insecurity because they are more likely to live in poverty and rely on subsistence farming to feed themselves and their families. When faced with lower crop yields, women are at higher risk for nutritional deficiencies, both because of increased reproductive demands (like menstruation and pregnancy), and because of underlying cultural norms that may prioritize feeding others. Similarly, gender-based social and cultural norms place responsibility for managing household water supply on women in LICs. As climate change strains freshwater resources globally, women spend more time and travel farther to locate, transport, and secure household water. Along the way, they can have increased exposure to heat, musculoskeletal injury, and face the threat of violence or abuse. Climate-related disasters like wildfires, storms, and flooding also have gendered health impacts. Women in low and middle-income countries are more likely to die from extreme weather or flooding events than their male counterparts because they are also more likely to be homebound, serving as caregivers, and unable to immediately escape climate-related disasters. Simultaneously, women have unequal access to disaster response services in the aftermath of such events, often losing access to essential sexual health and reproductive health services (SHRH) right when they need them the most.

SGMs are particularly socially vulnerable during disasters due to existing inequities as well as discriminatory disaster response policies. In the U.S., for example, LGBTQ+ people are more likely to live in poverty, experience unstable housing, and have chronic physical and mental health conditions, all leading to a higher risk of direct and indirect injury during extreme weather events. Additionally, disaster response policies in the U.S. do not explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity, or routinely recognize gender-diverse family structures, opening LGBTQ+ people to harm and separation when pursuing relief.

A Path Forward

Unfortunately, these are just a few of the many ways women and SGMs around the world are disproportionately impacted by the changing climate. Practitioners and teachers of global women’s health must be aware that current gaps in global health research limit our ability to fully understand and address gender-based health disparities worldwide. Integrating an intersectional and inclusive lens while defining, understanding, and teaching global women’s health is an important first step in addressing health disparities felt by women and other SGMs. Global women’s health practitioners must also use and teach a planetary health lens so they are better prepared to address contemporary health threats. Those leading community-based collaboration and bidirectional global women’s health partnerships must understand and teach concepts like gender-mainstreaming and climate action when developing projects aimed at improving women’s health. Lastly, global women’s health practitioners must understand and teach the importance of applying reproductive justice and human rights frameworks to climate action plans; this not only improves the adaptive capacity and resilience of women and other SGMs but also subsequently improves gender-based health disparities.

Definitions:

Sex refers to the biological characteristics that define humans such as female or male.

Gender refers to the socially constructed characteristics, norms, roles, and behaviors attributed to women, men, girls, boys, and non-binary people. Because gender is a social construct, ideas about gender vary across societies and time.

Gender equality refers to the equal rights, responsibilities, and opportunities of all genders.

LGBTQ+ is an acronym that collectively refers to individuals who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer. The “Q” can also stand for questioning, referring to those who are still exploring their own sexuality and/or gender. The “+” represents those who are part of the community, but for whom LGBTQ does not accurately capture or reflect their identity.

Sexual and gender minorities (SGMs) refers more broadly to people whose biological sex, sexuality, gender identity and/or gender expression depart from majority norms. The term ‘sexual and gender minorities’ includes considerable diversity as well as a multiplicity of identities and behaviors, including, but not limited to, individuals who identify as LGBTQ+. The term ‘sexual and gender minorities’ is preferentially used in global health contexts because the term ‘LGBTQ+’ is derived from Western contexts which may not apply to many people in the world.

Intersectionality refers to a theoretical framework born out of the Black feminist movement which maintains that individual identities (such as race, class, gender, sexual orientation, immigration status, etc.) intersect to create experiences of inequality within society. Research using intersectionality methods is ideally built on a foundation of coalition-building with the aim of gaining a deep understanding of the diversity of lived experiences and the ways in which systems of oppression and privilege impact these varied experiences. Such research also maintains that emphasis on one identity over another fails to capture the true causes of disparity in the world.

Gender mainstreaming is defined by the UN as “the process of assessing the implications for women and men of any planned action, including legislation, policies, or programs, in all areas and at all levels. It is a strategy for making women’s as well as men’s concerns and experiences an integral dimension of the design, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of policies and programs in all political, economic, and societal spheres so that women and men benefit equally, and inequality is not perpetuated. The ultimate goal is to achieve gender equality.”

Bhargavi Chekuri, MD, is Co-Director, Diploma in Climate Medicine, and Assistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO

Meredith Milligan, MD, is Family Physician and Leadership Preventive Medicine Resident, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH

Going “Glocal” in Yuma Arizona: How to Introduce Global Health Into Family Medicine Curriculum

By Natalia V. Galarza, MD and Kristina Diaz, MD

Global health has been identified as an increasing field of interest in medicine. As Koplan et al, mention, it can be thought as a notion, depending on current events. A definition for global health has never really been reached by consensus, and so it seems that global health can be adapted to the necessities of the location and time.

Many definitions touch on the fact that global health should improve health and achieve equity for all people and protect against global threats that disregard national borders.(1,2) It has deep connections with public health, blurring the boundaries between public health and global health. Within these connections, we have “border health” as a unique part of public health, with many characteristics being shared with the broader “global health.” For family medicine residency programs that are geographically located near the United States-Mexico border, the teaching of border health is embedded seamlessly in the medical resident education, so much that we tend to diminish its importance and gravitate toward other subjects of public and global health. It is easy to overlook the unique populations that we have in our own communities and focus on those that are more conventional and shared with other residency program or educational goals.

Continue reading