The STFM Medical Editing Fellowship: A Gateway to Scholarly Growth For Community Physicians

Priyanka Tulshian, MD, MPH
STFM Medical Editing Fellow (2023-2024)

The path of a community physician is replete with personal patient interactions, localized health solutions, and the day-to-day fulfillment that comes from serving the immediate needs of a community.  Yet, the pursuit of scholarship can sometimes seem like a distant reality, reserved for those in academia or large research-focused institutions. The Society of Teachers Family Medicine (STFM) Medical Editing fellowship presented me with a bridge between these two worlds, offering a community physician and educator a pathway to enhance my scholarly pursuits. My experience as a fellow has augmented my career in ways I had scarcely imagined.

For community physicians, scholarship often takes a back seat to the pressing demands of patient care. The STFM fellowship has opened the doors to the world of medical literature, providing tools and opportunities to contribute to the broader academic conversation without sacrificing the essence of community practice. I have come to embrace and recognize the similar skill set required in managing a patient… and managing a manuscript.

For me, the fellowship has been instrumental in the cultivation of a critical eye. As a physician, critical appraisal of literature underpins out practice, but the editorial lens is discerning of not just the content but the clarity, coherence, and contribution of a piece to the existing body of knowledge. This deepened sense of discernment is a skill that has enhanced both my practice and my teaching.

Moreover, engaging in the editing process has expanded my network, connecting me with authors, researchers, and educators from diverse backgrounds. These interactions have not only enriched my understanding of various healthcare issues but have also positioned me as a liaison who brings community based concerns to a national platform. I have the opportunity to become increasingly involved in dialogues that shape family medicine education and policy, thereby influencing patient care on a much broader scale.

The art of editing also cultivates the skill of writing, an invaluable asset for any physician-scholar. With each manuscript I review and edit, I hope that my own writing has become more precise and impactful.  The enhanced visibility of my work fosters further scholarly opportunities, contributing to a virtuous cycle of academic growth and reputation- building in the medical community. 

Furthermore, the mentorship inherent in the fellowship has been a rich source of professional development. Learning from seasoned editors and educators has provided me with a unique perspective on leadership in medicine. The mentorship provided has paved the way for long term relationships that support my ongoing professional journey.

The STFM fellowship has catalyzed my evolution from a community physician to a physician-scholar.  It has afforded me the platform to contribute to important conversations in family medicine and to apply those insights directly to my learners, patients, and community.  It has also taught me the value of scholarly activity as a means of professional satisfaction and career advancement. Community physicians have much to contribute to the landscape of family medicine and we should amplify our voices, share our unique insights, and ultimately enhance the health of our communities through scholarship.

Learn more about the STFM Medical Editing Fellowship and how to apply at https://www.stfm.org/medicaleditingfellow

Why Should I Be a Peer Reviewer?

Sarina Schrager, MD, MS
Editor-in -Chief, Family Medicine

Family Medicine, along with most other scientific journals, depends on volunteer peer reviewers to assure that we are publishing high quality papers. The act of peer reviewing advances the science of family medicine. Our editorial team is looking for a diversity of opinions and voices to assure the excellence of our published papers. I love peer reviewers and tell everyone I work with that they should volunteer to be one. Now, I am a little biased (being an editor of a journal that depends on peer reviewers), but I can’t overstate the important contributions of peer reviewers to the publication of our journal. So, if you already volunteer your time to do peer review, thank you. If you have not done any peer reviews, then let me tell you why you should.

First, being a peer reviewer will help you become a better writer and scholar. Reviewers may be inspired by positive attributes of papers while avoiding mistakes identified during the review. By reading what other people do, the way that they write and even how they do the research, you can decide what works and what you would do differently and then incorporate what you learn into your next paper. You can also learn about research methodology by reading about how others conducted studies. 

Peer reviewing can also help you learn about the publishing process and about science itself by reading what other reviewers and the associate editor says about a paper, and seeing what ends up getting published.  I always learn by reading reviewer comments and am excited when other reviewers had similar feedback to my own.

Second, being a peer reviewer can help your career.  It is an accomplishment that you can put on your CV and some journals will send a letter to your dean or chair recognizing you as a peer reviewer.   Also, if you do a good job with the review, you will be asked to review some more.  Potentially, you may be asked to be on the editorial board of the journal where you do peer reviews.   If you are interested in becoming an associate editor at a journal, the Editor in Chief will look at how many reviews you have done and whether they were high quality as a metric of your application. Being a peer reviewer can also build connections for future collaborations.   This is one way that you build your professional reputation.

Lastly, being a peer reviewer helps the discipline. By reading papers submitted to the journal, you will learn what is important in family medicine and what other scholars are studying in your area of interest.   You will be able to impact the quality of the papers that the journal publishes.  There is something very satisfying about seeing a paper in print that you reviewed because you helped make it as good as it is.

Doing a high-quality review does take time. The time needed to do a review will depend on the type of article (ie, an original research paper will take longer than a brief report or narrative because is it longer). Most people spend 1-3 hours on a review depending on the complexity of the article, your familiarity with the topic, and experience doing peer reviews. It is time well spent! Even one review a year greatly helps our journal.

We appreciate that people volunteer their time to do peer reviews and hope that we have helped convince you to sign up. Your voice is important. You bring unique skills and experience and can contribute to the excellence of our journal. You can sign up to be a reviewer at https://journals.stfm.org/familymedicine/reviewers/

Looking Back to Look Forward: In Support of the STFM Foundation

by Peter Coggan, MD

Peter Coggan, MD, pictured in fall 2023 at STFM headquarters in Leawood, KS.

Editors Note: The Winter 2023 STFM Blog features guest author and long-time STFM member Peter Coggan, MD, on the importance of preserving the sanctity of the physician-patient relationship through financial support of the STFM Foundation.

At the beginning of my career, looking back on it, like many faculty in the 1970s I was recruited out of private practice where I had enjoyed teaching medical students and residents rotating through my office. I approached my new role as full-time faculty with enthusiasm and rapidly realized that I was ill-prepared for it.

My first STFM meeting in 1979 was a revelation that was both exhilarating and intimidating. The plethora of workshops, presentations, and other activities were exactly what I needed, and, equally important, were the casual hallway conversations with other attendees – all of us struggling with many of the same questions. These were conversations in which shared problems were openly discussed, mistakes freely disclosed, and solutions offered but, perhaps most important of all, these were conversations that grew into mentorships and friendships over the years. I had found my academic home and in it a place that, at the heart of it all, would help me to realize my desire to teach the physicians of the future to provide better care and in doing so, become a better physician myself.

The middle of my career, as I look back on it, was marked by an increasing involvement with STFM – an almost unbroken attendance for 35 years at the national meeting – the privilege of running the Pre-Doc meeting (now retitled as the Conference on Medical Student Education), participating in multiple presentations, serving on STFM committees and the STFM Board of Directors (twice, in fact) and, with each experience, learning skills that were invaluable to my career.

In the autumn of my career, as I look back on it, the urging of Roger Sherwood (our then Executive Director), led me to the Foundation Board and the discovery of a wonderful opportunity to pay back for all that I had received through my membership in STFM through the Foundation’s many programs and initiatives.

Today in my dotage, as I look back on it, there is the grateful recognition that I could not have had the career opportunities that came my way without STFM. It is also gratifying to reflect on the many members I have met along the way who have become leaders in our field, with successful careers of their own as they carry the STFM mission forward.  Their innovations in presentations and projects first aired in the early and middle years of my STFM membership have, in many instances, joined the mainstream in teaching and patient care. And our specialty is much the better for it.

As for tomorrow, as I look forward to it, I close this brief homily. I hope you will forgive me for a reflection born of, as William Wordsworth expresses it “the inward eye that is the bliss of solitude”. Excellence in the care of patients and their families is the goal we all share in our teaching and our personal practice. Within that, and central to it, is the importance of the doctor-patient relationship, which is a core value for STFM, its Foundation, and the specialty of family medicine. As the practice of medicine continues to evolve as it must, new ways to identify and treat medical problems and ways to communicate with our patients will become everyday tools and, in this context, I look with confidence to STFM to ensure the doctor-patient relationship is preserved. After all, that relationship is central to the practice of medicine, the most intimate and personal of the professions, and, should it not survive, our profession will fade into obscurity.

That, as I look forward to, is the context in which I hope you will join me in supporting the STFM Foundation. My motivation, at the heart of it all, is my wish for you to teach the physicians of the future to provide better care and in doing so, become a better physician yourself, enhancing and preserving that essential quality of our profession – the sanctity of the physician-patient relationship.

We invite you to join Dr Coggan in ensuring future generations of family medicine educators continue to have access to the invaluable STFM resources. Just as the personal and professional contributions you’ve made to family medicine education have undoubtedly had a profound impact on those you’ve met, mentored, led, and collaborated with throughout your journey, a bequest to the STFM Foundation Endowment ensures that impact for generations to come. Your contribution directly supports STFM initiatives and programming like scholarship opportunities for underrepresented in medicine (URM) learners and educators, research grants, conferences, curricula, and more. The STFM Foundation Trustees created the Foundation Endowment to provide a mechanism for passionate family medicine educators to contribute to the long-term success of the STFM Foundation and STFM as a whole.