Tag Archives: health

SSI/SSD: What Is Our Role as Family Medicine Educators?

Colleen Fogarty,
MD, MSc

How do we as family medicine educators work with residents or students who come to precept saying, “I don’t think this patient is disabled but…” or “What am I supposed to do with this long form?”

As a family physician who has spent my career practicing and teaching in community health centers, I have come to recognize the importance of Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Social Security Disability Insurance (SSD) to many of my patients who are out of options. In our annual community medicine rotation, I co-teach a session with a local lawyer to help our residents understand some of the elements of disability determination so they can effectively manage requests for information and advocate for patients as suitable.

SSI, or Title XVI, is a needs-based federal benefits program for poor adults who are over 65 or disabled, and children under 18 who are disabled and whose families are poor. In contrast, Social Security Disability Insurance—or Title II—is an insurance program for disabled adults (wage earners) who have contributed into the Social Security system (FICA). This distinction is as important as it is confusing.

Why should we as family medicine educators know the details about these programs? In a word, poverty. Many of our patients with complex medical needs may be unable to engage in “substantial gainful activity” (SGA), the social security administration’s term for “work for a living.” Many poor individuals and families qualify for county-based programs such as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) or Safety Net assistance. These programs are administered at the county level; benefits vary among states, or—in some states—don’t exist at all. Typically, clients must re-apply every 6 months and must participate in some type of work, training, or rehabilitation. Since “Welfare Reform” in 1996, time limits have been imposed.

Given the increasing burden of public assistance, many counties are trying to shift clients off the local “welfare rolls” to SSI, a federal program. Having a reliable source of income adds a measure of stability to people’s lives and keeps them from continually running to the public assistance office, which in many counties can be chaotic and difficult to navigate. Now, when I say “reliable source of income” I am by no means implying that SSI is a gravy train. Just the opposite; SSI determines a set amount per recipient that is based on living arrangements and any other income. In New York in 2012, this comes to approximately $780 per month for the maximum benefit, for a total annual “income” of less than $12,000 per year. Many of my patients on SSI cannot afford to purchase routine hygiene products but are able to afford a low rent and reliably make their payments.

Importantly, SSI comes with health insurance. In two thirds of states, including New York and New Jersey, SSI recipients are automatically eligible for Medicaid. SSD recipients are automatically eligible for Medicare 24 months after receiving their first payment. Even with the imperfections and gaps in coverage of Medicaid and Medicare, having health insurance can mean the difference between getting needed health care and not.

Who is eligible for SSI or SSD?

The SSA Standard for Disability reads: “Inability to perform substantial gainful activity by reason of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment, or combination of impairments, which has lasted or is expected to last at least 12 consecutive months, or end in death, taking into account the individual’s age, education, and work history.” The SSA website http://www.ssa.gov/ contains a wealth of information and can facilitate online applications.

Disabled individuals who have enough work history and FICA contributions may be eligible for SSD. Chronically poor individuals without work history who have a disability expected to last 12 months may be eligible for SSI disability benefits.

Who determines disability, and how can I maintain an effective doctor-patient relationship?

I never promise a patient that she/he will qualify for SSI or SSD. I discuss the patient’s situation with them; in many cases they will have applied and been denied several times. Recommending a skilled disability lawyer is useful. I tell my patients that I will do a full clinical evaluation and provide the information requested to SSA or their lawyer. The Commissioner of Social Security determines disability, not the clinician. This is an important boundary for us to establish with our patients; it provides me a way to stay connected with my patient, honest with my findings, and advocate or not as appropriate to the clinical scenario. I don’t use the word “disable” as a verb, as in “I’ll disable you on this form.” In fact, I don’t tell them that at all, I simply do a full evaluation and document my findings, taking into account contributing factors such as mental illness, learning disability, and educational attainment.

SSA will consider the opinion of the treating source, that is, the primary clinician, as “controlling” if our documentation is well supported and not contradicted. This means that our words as primary care clinicians should carry more weight than consultative examiners or SSA clinicians. Our role is to write and record the patient’s history, diagnosis, limitations, and functional capacity to our best judgment.

At a practical level here are the things I do in practice to assist with these applications:

  1. Book an extended appointment with the patient, specifically to discuss the condition for which they claim disability.
  2. Ensure the patient has signed an appropriate release of information.
  3. Discuss with the patient the SSA definition of disability, my role in the process, and let them know I will provide them and their lawyer with a copy of the visit note documenting my findings.
  4. Use the electronic record to fully document the visit, listing the diagnoses evaluated and billing according to the level of service, usually 99214 for an established patient.
  5. Elicit and document a full occupational history, if not already done. Many of my patients have spotty work histories, based on prior or current mental health problems or other problems. Others have always done physical jobs and have no other skills to bring to the work force.
  6. Elicit and document an educational history. Was the patient diagnosed with a “learning disability” as a student? Have they attempted a GED course and exam? Is there other evidence of a learning problem? What about the possibility of a low IQ?
  7. Include in the assessment/plan a statement of functional limitation and residual functional capacity (eg, how much can the patient walk, stand, sit, lift, carry, bend, handle? How reliable is the patient with:
    1. Understanding, remembering, and carrying out simple instructions?
    2. Making simple work-related decisions?
    3. Responding appropriately to supervision, co-workers, and usual work situations?
    4. Dealing with changes in a routine work setting?
  8. Provide a copy to the patient, or send it directly to the lawyer or SSA address designated by the patient.

The National Health Care for the Homeless council has published two useful publications, one on general tips on documenting disability and an updated version geared for persons with substance use disorders and co-occuring impairments.

In summary, SSI for eligible individuals can make the difference between a reasonably stable chronic poverty and homelessness, and between access and non-access to health care. As advocates for improved health care, family medicine faculty should have some familiarity with their county social service benefits as well as federal programs, such as SSI and SSD. Family medicine residents need to learn to document and advocate for these programs as appropriate and recognize that certain vulnerable members of our communities may be disabled and thus eligible for available public assistance.

Acknowledgement:
The author thanks Catherine M. Callery, Esq, for her educational contributions to our residency program and for reviewing this essay.

Climate Change: What Is Our Role As Family Medicine Educators?

Colleen Fogarty,
MD, MSc

I coordinate and plan our annual community medicine rotation, a 3-week rotation for our interns at the very end of their year. This year, for our environmental health session, I invited a friend who has been making a film about the local effects of climate change. Kate Kressmann-Kehoe is a geologist by training, who literally suffered insomnia from worries about climate change. She successfully channeled her insomnia into the film, “Comfort Zone,” due for release this fall.

The film proved an excellent jumping off point for a multi-leveled discussion among our group of 13 residents. Some residents noted the regional economic effects of our very warm winter on our neighbors who clear snow or work in winter recreational activities. Others focused on the economic injustices of environmental change and noted that the large farmers — those with more economic resources — are more likely to adapt to a changing climate, while smaller farmers are at higher risk of total economic loss.

A startling piece of data that continues to haunt me is that if we do nothing to change our carbon footprint/CO2 emissions, Rochester, NY will experience a 10 degree F increase in temperature over the next century, and if we engage in some reduction of CO2 emissions, the temperature will increase by 5 degrees over that same time period. These changes would make the climate of Rochester like that of Georgia, or Virginia, respectively. While many local residents might enjoy a winter with less snow, the change in the climate will result in the loss of species and have an impact on the growing season and suitable crops.

Given the complexities of climate change, we centered much of our discussion on the public health threat of heat waves. The Chicago heat wave of 1995 resulted in the deaths of over 700 Chicagoans, the majority of whom were poor, elderly, and isolated. There were so many bodies that the city morgue needed to rent out a fleet of refrigerated semi-trucks in which to store the bodies. More recently, in 2003 a European heat wave killed an estimated 30,000.

Our discussion convinced me that heat waves, especially in urban areas, represent a growing threat. In fact, 2 weeks after our educational session, New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo announced the availability of air conditioning units to medically eligible low-income persons with written physician documentation that states that air conditioning assistance is “critical to prevent a heat emergency.”

Climate change warrants our awareness and involvement in planning. Family physicians can begin to assess patients for risk factors for heat-related morbidity and mortality and provide education about the importance of hydration and low exertion during heat waves.

How isolated are our patients? How mobile? How can our patients and their families access community resources, such as libraries, community centers, beaches, and spray parks? How many of our patients have air conditioning or easy access to family members with air conditioning? How about those with respiratory diseases? How can we work with our local public health and community officials to prevent the scale of death that occurred in Chicago in 1995?

Our community health curriculum must begin to raise our awareness as physicians of local effects of climate change and mobilize us to take action to prevent harm to our communities.

Family Medicine Should Be a Prominent Voice in Social Media

Mark Ryan, MD

In this post on my Social Media Healthcare blog I described why I think physicians benefit from being active in social media. The combined benefits of enhanced partnerships and new connections, keeping up with current clinical and health policy information, and expanding one’s understanding of health care from the perspective of patients and other health care providers are valuable outcomes that all physicians should value. After all, why do we read journals, attend CME, watch webinars, and listen to conference calls? To keep our clinical

knowledge up to date in order to provide the best care for our patients and to learn from each others’ experiences. Active participation in social media can provide these same benefits.

Over the last couple of years, I have seen more and more family physicians becoming active on social media, especially on Twitter.  I have been trying to keep a list of all the family physicians (and GPs) I have encountered on Twitter, though I know that this must be incomplete. A quick scan of the list, however, shows the breadth of perspectives and opinions held by family physicians and gives insight into the challenges and rewards of being a family doctor.

I believe that family medicine can, and should, be even more active on social media. In fact, I believe that family medicine should be the prominent medical specialty in social media and especially on Twitter. Here’s why:

  • Family medicine believes in empowering patients to take active roles in their care. Social media is a prime venue for patients who are seeking to learn from each other and share experiences.Through the e-patient movement, patients use social media to inform themselves and each other about health, wellness, and specific illnesses. Physicians are rarely part of the discussion. With the breadth of knowledge family physicians have, we can join in to help ensure patients have accurate and reliable information. Family medicine’s bio-psycho-social approach to care, which enables us to provide capable and effective care for patients with chronic illness, would also be valuable in discussions with engaged and empowered patients who are seeking to improve their health.
  • Too many people don’t understand family medicine. As noted in this recent post, primary care and family medicine are not usually given starring roles in the media and are often confronted with the argument that the role of family physicians can be easily assumed by nurse practitioners and physician assistants. By talking about our careers, our practices, and (within the bounds of patient privacy and confidentiality) our patients—their illnesses, struggles, and victories—we can control the message and we can show the public what it means to be a family physician.
  • Family physicians are taught to educate and inform patients and to be a resource to those who seek information about their health. The Pew Internet Project has noted that even though many Americans don’t consider themselves e-patients, large numbers of people with health concerns are looking for information online and are using peer-to-peer connections to find answers. Our patients are using social media; why aren’t we? Given family medicine’s whole-person orientation and patient-centered approach to care, we should strive to meet our patients where they are. Increasingly, they are online.
  • For many years, it has been difficult to recruit US medical students into family medicine. Now that more and more medical students are using social media, we could act as virtual role models and mentors. If there is a robust and vibrant family medicine community online, and if we discuss what we love about being family physicians, we might encourage medical students (and premedical students) to look at careers in family medicine.
  • Social media provides an opportunity to unite to advocate for change. As seen in Mike Sevilla’s #SaveGME campaign, when family docs organize, we can have notable reach. The #SaveGME initiative was a short-notice, one-time effort to point out the importance of protecting GME funding. Even with limited preparation, the group was able to reach tens of thousands of people. Imagine if all family physicians on social media organized to advocate on key positions: I suspect we could reach hundreds of thousands of people.