Category Archives: Family Medicine Stories

We Do Not Interrupt Our Patients

Joseph Scherger, MD, MPH

Ever notice a patient wince when interrupted describing his or her problem? It is well known that physicians interrupt their patients much of the time and usually within 30 seconds of the start of the visit. One study in Family Medicine showed that residents interrupted patients 12 seconds into a visit 25% of the time (article pdf).  We even teach interruptions as part of “controlling the conversation” and “limiting the agenda” for the visit.

In a practice where there is ample time for visits, there is rarely if ever a need to interrupt a patient. I’m now in such a setting after more than 30 years of brief office visits, and I had to train myself to not interrupt patients. What a great feeling that is! At our practice, we sit back and let every patient finish what he or she has to say. Patients notice this, too, saying they have never had a physician listen to them like we do. We learn things about patients they have not had the chance to share with physicians before.

Since we have an hour for every new patient visit, early in the encounter I ask the patient to tell me his or her story. The patient often asks, “Which story?” I say, “Where were you born and what happened after that?” It is amazing to me how most patients finish this story in about 5 minutes. As a matter of fact, I’m impressed with how brief most patients are when giving their narratives uninterrupted.

Our physicians are now demonstrating an uninterrupted communication style to medical students in their family medicine clerkships. By the time they arrive at our practice, they have already been taught to interrupt patients, so we teach them otherwise. Often, this helps them love family medicine. We look forward to training residents in uninterrupted narrative next year when our residency program starts.

Interrupting patients is a part of the paternalistic culture of medicine where the physician’s time is more important than the patient’s, and the physician knows better than the patient what the problem is. Such paternalism is unprofessional and even dangerous and should not be a part of patient-centered care.

I admire professionals who let people have their say completely. Counselors are very good at this and so are good lawyers, realtors, designers, and many others. Interruptions seem to be mainly a physician behavior.

Visits with patient can be efficient without interruptions. When patients have been given the chance to say everything they want during the visit, they are more receptive to hearing our assessment and recommendations for managing their problems. After all, patients are in charge of their care. Our job is to serve them, respectfully and without interruption.

Why Medical Students Should Advocate

Attending the Family Medicine Congressional Conference in Washington, DC,  last month was an amazing experience.

Aaron Meyer

Aaron Meyer
Medical Student

Physicians, residents, and students spent the first day immersing ourselves in family medicine action on Capitol Hill. Thought-provoking discussions on family medicine pipeline and payment reform helped me understand how these issues affect students currently and will continue to do so in the near future. Issues like ensuring continued funding for National Health Service Corps so students can follow their convictions and work in underserved areas. Advocating for a permanent repeal to the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) so students don’t have to worry about the financial stability of their future practices. And encouraging modernization of Graduate Medical Education (GME) funding so our training can more fully reflect who we are as family physicians.

After the first day of updates on family medicine’s governmental advocacy, we were able to meet Congressional Representatives, Senators, and their aides. The Missouri Academy of Family Physicians delegation and I were able to sit down and talk with US Representative Russ Carnahan about what we had learned the previous day. We told him about two House Bills related to GME funding reform and SGR repeal and urged him to support the future of family medicine (and possibly be a co-sponsor on the bills).

I’m a political junkie, so meeting Rep. Carnahan was exhilarating. I was so happy that I was able to talk to him about the importance of protecting National Health Service Corps funding and other issues that affect students. Reflecting on my experiences at this conference, I am 100% positive that a student’s voice is incredibly important on Capitol Hill. Hearing a student like me talk about my $200,000 debt upon graduation and how vital pipeline and payment reform are in ensuring that all patients have a family doctor is a message that all legislators need to hear.

Advocating on behalf of the future of family medicine is advocating on behalf of the future of health care in this country. I encourage all students to become involved in advocacy because we have an important voice, and we will form the backbone of the next generation of physicians.

 For more information on medical student advocacy check out these resources:

The 2014 Family Medicine Congressional Conference April 7-8

Students, Residents: Stand Up and Make a Difference for Family Medicine

Watch advocacy videos and view the advocacy toolkit

The New Resident Work Hours—Are We Training Shift Workers?

Joseph Scherger, MD, MPH

Throughout my career, I have been in favor of restrictions on resident work hours. After watching how surgery residents worked in the 1970s, I wanted none

of that “prison sentence.” After choosing family medicine, I found a program with “civilized” work hours. I do not think much learning happens after working 80 hours in a week, and patients do get harmed by residents who are too fatigued to care or use good judgment.

I embraced the 2003 ACGME resident work hour restrictions since they had flexibility but limited the on-duty time to 80 hours a week and guaranteed some days off each month. Residents could still sit with patients who were going through a long labor and delivery process or who were in end-of-life care. These long experiences are some of the most memorable for residents and do not occur too often to cause chronic fatigue. They showed the resident how well they can work under occasional extreme circumstances, a skill that would be valuable in a crisis.

The 2011 ACGME work hour restrictions are much more specific and prohibit the time for any “work shift.” First-year residents may no longer work on any given day more than 16 hours. That means that if the resident is with a woman in labor or at the bedside of a critically ill patient they must end their work and turn the care over to another resident. Second- and third-year residents must do the same after 24 hours and must be able to have a “strategic nap” after 16 hours. Is this the continuity of care of a family physician? No family physician in practice would ever consider such an abandonment of their patient! This is how emergency room physicians work, and I wonder if these new work restrictions will transform family medicine into shift workers.

There is evidence that we become less effective in our clinical judgment after 12 hours of continuous work and certainly after 16 hours. With that being so, we should train for teamwork where another physician joins us in the care of the patients after we become less effective. That would reinforce that we are not superman and should ask for help but would not take us away from the very situations where we may be doing the most good and are having a great learning experience.

I hope our leaders in the ACGME will make an effort to revise the resident work restrictions again to allow for both continuity of care and teamwork, so we can balance both clinical experience and patient safety.