Demystify the Superhero Role of High-Resource Countries in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs)

Mariquita Belen, MD, MAS, FAAFP,
Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH

Almost 16 years after being in the United States of America as a physician, we visited our birth country—Philippines. An 18-hour flight seemed nothing compared to more than a decade of being away. The excitement to speak in Tagalog again, touch Filipino patients, and heal the people who cannot afford to pay private physicians motivated us to plan this medical mission for more than a year. The partnership with the local municipal health officer and the mayor made the collaboration easy.  But no! The process of applying for temporary medical licensure, recruiting local physicians who would be available while we were there, and sending the medical supplies from the US was not pain-free and fast.

In the midst of the humid summer, we arrived on site, armed with our American way of training. Yet, we were not in America.  We were ready to screen for cervical cancer. There was no liquid-based cytology.  Not all beds had stirrups.   The local health center used the conventional glass slides and hair spray as fixatives. We had to use a rolled towel to lift the pelvis up while the women’s legs were in frog-leg position. We used a flashlight to illuminate the pelvic area. We learned their way of doing it, which was their right way.

They were the expert and we were their partners. We were there as extra hands. In eight hours, with five physicians, we did pelvic examination and pap smear on 219 women. It felt like an assembly line with the community health workers doing the intake history-taking, then we did the speculum and pelvic examination, then another team of health workers doing the fixation, labelling, and packing.

It flowed very smoothly. Nobody complained.  Patients waited for their turn with smiles on their face. One glass slide broke during the packing and the patient came back with no signs of disappointment.  She eagerly went to the examination table since she already knew the drill.

Clearly, we were not the superhero in this mission. We were impressed that with very limited resources, how could they make this process worked so well.  How community health workers who had elementary or high school diploma be an effective and efficient part of the health care team. They were empowered.

We concluded with a better understanding of ourselves and how we could mutually learn and support one another. The adaptability, resilience and community engagement during the medical mission in the Philippines shed more light to me.  Health care collaboration was a meaningful and sustainable experience when resource-rich countries partnered horizontally with host countries. Letting them lead their right way, and we would follow along.

The STFM Medical Editing Fellowship: A Gateway to Scholarly Growth For Community Physicians

Priyanka Tulshian, MD, MPH
STFM Medical Editing Fellow (2023-2024)

The path of a community physician is replete with personal patient interactions, localized health solutions, and the day-to-day fulfillment that comes from serving the immediate needs of a community.  Yet, the pursuit of scholarship can sometimes seem like a distant reality, reserved for those in academia or large research-focused institutions. The Society of Teachers Family Medicine (STFM) Medical Editing fellowship presented me with a bridge between these two worlds, offering a community physician and educator a pathway to enhance my scholarly pursuits. My experience as a fellow has augmented my career in ways I had scarcely imagined.

For community physicians, scholarship often takes a back seat to the pressing demands of patient care. The STFM fellowship has opened the doors to the world of medical literature, providing tools and opportunities to contribute to the broader academic conversation without sacrificing the essence of community practice. I have come to embrace and recognize the similar skill set required in managing a patient… and managing a manuscript.

For me, the fellowship has been instrumental in the cultivation of a critical eye. As a physician, critical appraisal of literature underpins out practice, but the editorial lens is discerning of not just the content but the clarity, coherence, and contribution of a piece to the existing body of knowledge. This deepened sense of discernment is a skill that has enhanced both my practice and my teaching.

Moreover, engaging in the editing process has expanded my network, connecting me with authors, researchers, and educators from diverse backgrounds. These interactions have not only enriched my understanding of various healthcare issues but have also positioned me as a liaison who brings community based concerns to a national platform. I have the opportunity to become increasingly involved in dialogues that shape family medicine education and policy, thereby influencing patient care on a much broader scale.

The art of editing also cultivates the skill of writing, an invaluable asset for any physician-scholar. With each manuscript I review and edit, I hope that my own writing has become more precise and impactful.  The enhanced visibility of my work fosters further scholarly opportunities, contributing to a virtuous cycle of academic growth and reputation- building in the medical community. 

Furthermore, the mentorship inherent in the fellowship has been a rich source of professional development. Learning from seasoned editors and educators has provided me with a unique perspective on leadership in medicine. The mentorship provided has paved the way for long term relationships that support my ongoing professional journey.

The STFM fellowship has catalyzed my evolution from a community physician to a physician-scholar.  It has afforded me the platform to contribute to important conversations in family medicine and to apply those insights directly to my learners, patients, and community.  It has also taught me the value of scholarly activity as a means of professional satisfaction and career advancement. Community physicians have much to contribute to the landscape of family medicine and we should amplify our voices, share our unique insights, and ultimately enhance the health of our communities through scholarship.

Learn more about the STFM Medical Editing Fellowship and how to apply at https://www.stfm.org/medicaleditingfellow

Why Should I Be a Peer Reviewer?

Sarina Schrager, MD, MS
Editor-in -Chief, Family Medicine

Family Medicine, along with most other scientific journals, depends on volunteer peer reviewers to assure that we are publishing high quality papers. The act of peer reviewing advances the science of family medicine. Our editorial team is looking for a diversity of opinions and voices to assure the excellence of our published papers. I love peer reviewers and tell everyone I work with that they should volunteer to be one. Now, I am a little biased (being an editor of a journal that depends on peer reviewers), but I can’t overstate the important contributions of peer reviewers to the publication of our journal. So, if you already volunteer your time to do peer review, thank you. If you have not done any peer reviews, then let me tell you why you should.

First, being a peer reviewer will help you become a better writer and scholar. Reviewers may be inspired by positive attributes of papers while avoiding mistakes identified during the review. By reading what other people do, the way that they write and even how they do the research, you can decide what works and what you would do differently and then incorporate what you learn into your next paper. You can also learn about research methodology by reading about how others conducted studies. 

Peer reviewing can also help you learn about the publishing process and about science itself by reading what other reviewers and the associate editor says about a paper, and seeing what ends up getting published.  I always learn by reading reviewer comments and am excited when other reviewers had similar feedback to my own.

Second, being a peer reviewer can help your career.  It is an accomplishment that you can put on your CV and some journals will send a letter to your dean or chair recognizing you as a peer reviewer.   Also, if you do a good job with the review, you will be asked to review some more.  Potentially, you may be asked to be on the editorial board of the journal where you do peer reviews.   If you are interested in becoming an associate editor at a journal, the Editor in Chief will look at how many reviews you have done and whether they were high quality as a metric of your application. Being a peer reviewer can also build connections for future collaborations.   This is one way that you build your professional reputation.

Lastly, being a peer reviewer helps the discipline. By reading papers submitted to the journal, you will learn what is important in family medicine and what other scholars are studying in your area of interest.   You will be able to impact the quality of the papers that the journal publishes.  There is something very satisfying about seeing a paper in print that you reviewed because you helped make it as good as it is.

Doing a high-quality review does take time. The time needed to do a review will depend on the type of article (ie, an original research paper will take longer than a brief report or narrative because is it longer). Most people spend 1-3 hours on a review depending on the complexity of the article, your familiarity with the topic, and experience doing peer reviews. It is time well spent! Even one review a year greatly helps our journal.

We appreciate that people volunteer their time to do peer reviews and hope that we have helped convince you to sign up. Your voice is important. You bring unique skills and experience and can contribute to the excellence of our journal. You can sign up to be a reviewer at https://journals.stfm.org/familymedicine/reviewers/